#commissionsearned
The Franco Sarto Women's Bocca2 Slip-On Loafer combines classic design with modern sensibilities, making it an appealing choice for those who appreciate stylish yet comfortable footwear. With its flexible sole and hair calf plug, this loafer elevates the traditional slip-on shoe to new heights. Franco Sarto's dedication to craftsmanship is evident in every pair, as he merges his background as a cobbler with his passion for elegant design.
| Product Name | Image | Price | Rating | Review Count | Expert Score | Sales Last Month | Buy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skechers Men's Slip-on Loafer |  | $79.97 | (4.3) | 6491 | 96 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Easy Spirit Traveltime Women's Slip On |  | $42.97 | (4.3) | 4734 | 94 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Soda Women's Casual Slip On Sandals |  | $19.99 | (4.3) | 840 | 87 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Easy Spirit Women's Traveltime Slip-On |  | $46.96 | (4.3) | 394 | 87 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Steve Madden Women's Kandi Slip-on Loafer |  | $49.99 | (4.3) | 1340 | 86 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Clarks Women's Rosalyn Adele Slip-On Loafer |  | $64.42 | (4.3) | 516 | 86 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| TRETORN Women's Meg Slip On Sneakers |  | $34.48 | (4.3) | 121 | 86 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Naturalizer Women's, Kayden Moc Slip-On |  | $23.22 | (4.3) | 177 | 86 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Franco Sarto Womens EDA Classic Slip on Loafer |  | $68.43 | (4.3) | 87 | 85 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| LifeStride Women's March on Moc Slip-on Loafer |  | $49.89 | (4.3) | 42 | 85 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Cull4U Women's Breathable Slip On Loafer Shoes |  | $32.99 | (4.3) | 149 | 85 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Easy Spirit Women's Arena Casual Slip-On Loafer |  | $34.6 | (4.3) | 149 | 85 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Naturalizer Women's Luv Slip on Memory Foam Loafer |  | $63.99 | (4.3) | 111 | 85 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Franco Sarto Women's Waxton Bootie |  | $75.99 | (4.3) | 413 | 85 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
| Franco Sarto Women's Nolan Pump |  | $106.09 | (4.3) | 1959 | 85 | 10 | Get it on Amazon |
I love these shoes. This pair is a replacement pair as I wear them a lot. Only issue is the heel separated from the bottom of the shoe. Need to take them to the cobbler. Have never had this (or any) issue with Franco Sarto shoes. Still giving 5 stars though.
I've wanted these loafers for SO long, and I finally bit the bullet and bought TWO pairs. Way back when I first saw them, I think they were considerably more expensive, and it just seemed like there was always something else that took priority. Now, at a much better price, I'm so glad I finally got them. They're a true classic ... look really good with tights and a knee-length, straight skirt, by the way. I first bought a 10.5M (I normally wear a 10M), based on reviews, deciding to err on the side of caution. However, I ended up exchanging for my normal size, and they fit perfectly. For your reference, I have a very high arch, a somewhat narrow heel and somewhat wide forefoot. Also for your reference, if you've seen the high-heeled version of this shoe (that's my description, not theirs), which I believe is called the "Nolan," that shoe was way too narrow for me in my regular width. This one isn't. I wish I'd been on the ball soon enough to get these in the brown, too. As for the comfort, they do have a padded bottom, not overly padded, but not so thin you feel like you're walking around on cardboard. I don't feel a lot of arch support in there, but they are comfortable nonetheless, so there must be SOMETHING in there. I can wear them all day long, no problem.
An excellent sturdy shoe. While still looking sleek.
As many people reported, the right shoe is a full half-size smaller than the other. It just happens that most of us have feet that vary a half-size, too. So the people who have feet mirroring the shoes are happy, and the others are asking, "WTF?" I'm not talking about how they feel; I'm talking about placing them sole to sole or side-by-side, and seeing the extra length.I have wide feet, truly a 6.5 D and even, sometimes, 6 EE. You can't really find those, so I usually order a 1/2-1.0 size up, to 7D (usually that's a 7D) or 7.5 C-B These are 7W, which is indeed only a "C", not a "D". They fit okay because my left foot is the one that's almost a half-size bigger. I can't say which one of these shoes is really the 7W shoe of the pair, or, therefore whether that one is true to size!They are comfortable, but nothing like a walking shoe,or other sport shoe. Compared to cushion-less, pointy-toed flats, or even low pumps, they are a dream, but I wouldn't wear them for long walks on hard pavement, unless you're young enough to have major fat pads on the bottom of your feet--say, under age 30.The wides aren't loose enough to allow an added insole, so unless you have very narrow feet and can buy the wides specifically to leave room to add a cushion, they won't work.Lastly, I purchased a pair of dark Navy blue ones from someone who bought two colors, and then never wore the blue. They were made in Brazil, and that supposedly means they were the much-mourned "old quality". Having shoe models drop drastically in quality over years, with cheaper materials and so on, is a very real problem. But I can say that the quality of the Brazil shoe I have is no better, if you mean thickness and sturdiness of the leather, stitching, sole, or insole.The "Brazil quality" are a little more squared-off and roomier in the very tip of the toe box, and the "last" (straightness vs. c-shaped curve of the sole) is more curved or offset in the "old" ones. For many people with wide feet, a curved last is bad; it means the width is useless because your feet get squished into one side of the "C" and the big-toe half of the toe box is practically empty.So there is more room in the 7.5B "Brazil" toe area than in the 7W version, and yet both are not really wide in the toe. That's because the shoe tapers TOP TO BOTTOM sooner than most shoes do, and the "B" or "W" is only for side-to-side width. Those of you who complained they ordered a 1/2 size up and still felt their toes jammed; this is why. They do it to skimp on leather, or give a sleek, tapered side profile, and its the opposite of the "added depth" that are the hallmark of "comfort shoes", diabetic walking shoes, etc.Overall, it's an attractive shoe, decent quality, classic style. a GOOD BUY FOR THE PRICE in the 40s. The leather is too thin for these to hold their shape and avoid crimping and twisting, long-term, though; it's not like you're buying Birkenstock or Panama Jack. (Yeah, yeah; I know these are dress shoes, but still...the leather is THIN.) That's the other reason why you might not want to do a lot of long sweaty miles in them...moisutre and twisting/ stretching =lumpy, creased shoes.So nothing to weep about if you've been pining for a first or replacement pair, and they're sold out. I was expecting more.FYI: The solid old navy (not brush-off blue), if they come back on the market, are so dark that they look like a flat black or very dark grey, rather than deep blue.
Great casual shoe. Fit accurate.
I have to say these are a very nice pair of shoes and comfortable but over time the shoe start to disintegrate on the inside.
These loafers are a must and I happy they are still selling this shoe. This is my fifth pair of these loafers because they fit well and look good with anything.
