Big improvement from Peregrine 8s - also these are trail running shoes, not walking shoes
I'm 50 miles into owning this pair, having done quick midweek runs as well as a couple 13-15 mile runs.Also, like I said in the title, I'm confused about the product description saying "walking shoe". These are most definitely trail running shoes. Their lugs (deep, chunky teeth in the sole) are not designed for paved surfaces. That said, these could certainly work for hiking...though hiking shoes/boots would be better for that, right? I'm not sure...I'm just a trail runner.Ok, now for the actual review:I've been a fan of Saucony for years, and Kinvaras have been my go-to for the roads. When I started to transitioning to the trails, I was inclined to stay with Saucony since it seemed logical that they would be more likely to work for me despite Saucony not being one of the more popular brands for trail runners. I got close to 500 miles out of my Peregrine 8s, including a 9.5hr race, and had no issues.These 10s are a clear step up, though. The materials appear and feel much more advanced. It feels like they have a more form-fitting structure. I like that they are using less thick lugs to avoid trapping mud. There are just as many lugs as on the older generation, though. Also, the addition of a rock plate is lovely. Being new to having a rock plate, I'm naturally AIMING for sharp rocks now, because there's some novelty for me to not have it pierce through to my foot. I haven't felt any noticeable downsides to the plate either when it comes to flex.I see that there are a couple negative reviews when it comes to construction and I saw those for the 8 as well. For the 8, the criticism was that holes would form in the mesh around your toes. I did finally get that issue, but not for the first 400 miles. I was also pleased to see that Saucony added extra overlay on top of the toes of the 10, which I imagine was to prevent this. If construction is a concern for you, but you still want to buy these, I'd buy them from a local run shop. A local shop is likely to actually take them back if you come back a week or two later with a significant issue like this, as I imagine they will also be able to return it to their distributor. That said, I've gone through at least 10 pairs of Saucony shoes without experiencing any manufacturing defects.Anyway, I'm very excited to see this improvement from Saucony, as it seems they're getting serious about trail shoes. I just hope future iterations are continual improvements, as opposed to what we're seeing with Kinvaras :/
✔ Verified Purchase
Awesome replacement for my Peregrine 8's
I have a pair of Peregrine 8 shoes that have worn out to the point that they have holes in them that allows all sorts of mud and dirt inside. I mean, you can see my toes. That said, they still worked great... the tread was perfect and still gripped like crazy. So I decided to replace them with these Peregrine 10's. First off, they look great. Saucony likes to produce these things in lots of shades of gray, so it was nice to see a colorway that actually had color. It's not like I'm wearing these things to work... I want something a little bit lively, especially on a rainy gross day. Next up, I feel like these things are sturdier than the 8 version. Purely subjective, but they feel like they are going to stand up better. I'm pretty rough on these things though... dunk them under a lot of water and into a lot of mud. Finally, performance wise, I have no complaints. They are Peregrines. After I got them I ended up climbing up and down some rocks in the San Juan Islands. The grip on these things make you feel like Spiderman. They're especially good here in the Pacific NW where the trail can be anything from pavement to a muddy mess. (Saucony makes an even grippier version for truly muddy trails, but I prefer these for their overall performance.)
✔ Verified Purchase
P
phranman
November 05, 2020
Excellent trail shoe
From left to right: Peregrine 7, Peregrine ISO, Peregrine 10. First off, all of these shoes are pretty great, and all of them have short-comings.All three models are "low-drop." The drop from heal to forefoot is 4mm - this is an amazing element to the design and encourages a much healthier, safer foot-strike and form. All three models have the *amazing* lugs/lug-pattern. There are different materials on all 3 (I think). They're all very similar and effective, though I'd say I like the 10's the most. They're a bit softer, which I actually wasn't too excited about, but they are very grippy, and have stood up to some pretty serious hikes/trail runs. I have about 400miles on my 10's and the lugs are still prominent and effective. I do keep them on trails, no pavement. All three models suck on pavement. That's just not what they're meant for. I mean, they're sneakers so they'll feel like sneakers, period, but the lugs are meant for unimproved terrain, as is the support of the soul and upper. If you're not gonna be on a trail 90% of the time or more, don't get these.The Peregrine 10 is awesome and I highly recommend. I just bought a second pair, as my first are running out. The upper is fantastic. Has a nice toe box, really supportive, good lacing system, and the heel/ankle area is perfect - low enough that there's no irritation anywhere, and high enough to keep debris getting in to a minimum, and also allows the laces/lace-system, and design of the upper to keep your foot in place and the shoe from moving around. I love it. If properly laced and tied, you literally cannot take the 10s off without untying them. They are NOT any kind of exposure resistant. Moisture will get in easily and if it's cold, your feet will be cold until you really get moving (my biggest critique). The Peregrine 7's have the best upper I've ever seen on a trail shoe. Like, the most utilitarian design - notably exposure resistant (water resistant, warm, and would dry quickly and thoroughly), and tough.The footbed and cushioning in the 10s is really good as well. Not super hard or soft, a good, comfortable middle ground of cushioning. I do think it could be a little softer, but I've had no problems, and the protection from rocks is excellent, best of all three gens. I've stepped on plenty of rocks and been fully protected (I'm 5'11, 190lbs). My heaviest days will have like 4miles of hard running, with elevation changes, including sprints, and then another 5miles of hiking. The Peregrine 10's have always kept me very comfortable. The Peregrine 7 is the *perfect* amount padding. Like, right to the line where it would be too soft, but not over - it's really amazing. The Peregrine ISO's are like walking on wooden sandals. Not great. The ISO's kinda suck, for real. Glad they're gone. They're in the mix compared to other brands, and they have those awesome lugs, but they're not good Peregrines.The Peregrine 7 imo is the best trail shoe of all-time (I've had New Balance, ASICS, Alta, Adidas, and three gens of Peregrines). Just looking at them it's clear, they'll get you through some stuff. I did 30 miles backpacking the Long Trail, in Vermont, with the 7s and they were stunning. I hope the Peregrine 11's are a mix between the 7s and 10s. The design of the 10s for athletic performance and rock protection, with the materials and the outdoors approach of the 7s.Def worth the buy!
✔ Verified Purchase
